Few Uncomfortable Truths You Won’t Hear from the 2016 Presidential
John W. Whitehead September 26, 2016
liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do
not want to hear.”—George Orwell
final countdown has begun to the 2016 presidential election, and you can expect
to be treated to an earful of carefully crafted sound bites and political
the dire state of our nation, however, you can rest assured that none of the
problems that continue to undermine our freedoms will be addressed in any
credible, helpful way by any of the so-called viable presidential candidates.
Certainly not if doing so might jeopardize their standing with the unions,
corporations or the moneyed elite bankrolling their campaigns.
the interest of liberty and truth, here are a few uncomfortable truths about
life in the American police state that we will not be hearing from either of the
two leading presidential candidates.
government is not our friend. Nor does it work for “we the people.”
Our so-called government representatives do not actually represent us,
We are now ruled
by an oligarchic elite of governmental and corporate interests whose main
interest is in perpetuating power and control.
Republicans and Democrats like to act as if there’s a huge difference
between them and their policies. However, they are not sworn enemies so much as
they are partners in crime, united in a common goal, which is to maintain
the status quo.
Presidential elections are not exercises in self-government. They are
merely business forums for selecting the next CEO of the United States of
No matter which candidate wins this election, the police state will
continue to grow. In other words, it will win and “we the people” will lose.
The lesser of two evils is still evil.
Twenty years ago, a newspaper
headline asked the question: “What’s the difference between a politician and
a psychopath?” The answer, then and now, remains the same: None. There is
virtually no difference between psychopaths and politicians.
Americans only think they’re choosing the next president. In
truth, however, they’re engaging in the illusion of participation culminating in
the reassurance ritual of voting. It’s just another manufactured illusion
conjured up in order to keep the populace compliant and convinced that their
vote counts and that they still have some influence over the political process.
More than terrorism, more than domestic extremism, more than gun
violence and organized crime, the U.S. government has become a greater menace to
the life, liberty and property of its citizens than any of the so-called dangers
from which the government claims to protect us.
The government knows exactly which buttons to push in order to
manipulate the populace and gain the public’s cooperation and compliance.
Fear, which now permeates the populace, leads to fascism.
If voting made any difference, they wouldn’t let us do it.
government—which is comprised of un-elected government bureaucrats,
corporations, contractors, paper-pushers, and button-pushers who are actually
calling the shots behind the scenes right now and operates beyond the reach of
the Constitution with no real accountability to the citizenry—is the real reason
why “we the people” have no control over our government.
The government does whatever it wants.
You no longer have to be poor, black or guilty to be treated
like a criminal in America. All that is required is that you belong to the
suspect class—that is, the citizenry—of the American police state.
As a de
facto member of this so-called criminal class, every U.S. citizen is now
guilty until proven innocent.
Any police officer who shoots to kill rather than incapacitate is no
longer a guardian of the people. By appointing himself judge, jury and
executioner over a fellow citizen, such a police officer short-circuits a legal
system that was long ago established to protect against such abuses by
Whether instigated by the government or the citizenry, violence will
only lead to more violence. Anyone who believes that they can wage—and win—an
armed revolt against the American police state is playing right into the
“We the people” are no longer shielded by the rule of law.
First Amendment—which gives us a voice—is being muzzled, the Fourth
Amendment—which protects us from being bullied, badgered, beaten, broken and
spied on by government agents—is being disemboweled.
Government eyes are watching you. They see your every move: what you
read, how much you spend, where you go, with whom you interact, when you wake up
in the morning, what you’re watching on television and reading on the internet.
Every move you make is being monitored, mined for data, crunched, and tabulated
in order to form a picture of who you are, what makes you tick, and how best to
control you when and if it becomes necessary to bring you in line.
By gradually whittling away at our freedoms—free speech, assembly, due
process, privacy, etc.—the government has, in effect, liberated itself from its
contractual agreement to respect our constitutional rights while resetting the
calendar back to a time when we had no Bill of Rights to protect us from the
long arm of the government.
Private property means nothing if the government can take your home,
car or money under the flimsiest of pretexts, whether it be asset forfeiture
schemes, eminent domain or overdue property taxes.
Parents no longer have the final say over what their kids are taught,
how they are disciplined, or what kinds of medical care they need. From the
moment they are born to the time they legally come of age, young people are now
wards of the state.
All you need to do in order to be flagged
as a suspicious character, labeled an enemy of the state and locked up like
a dangerous criminal is use certain trigger words, surf the internet,
communicate using a cell phone, drive a car, stay at a hotel, purchase materials
at a hardware store, take flying or boating lessons, appear suspicious, question
government authority, or generally live in the United States.
Americans are powerless in the face of militarized police.
Despite the revelations of the past several years, nothing has changed
to push back against the American police state. Our freedoms—especially the
Fourth Amendment—continue to be choked out by a prevailing view among government
bureaucrats that they have the right to search, seize, strip, scan, spy on,
probe, pat down, taser, and arrest any individual at any time
and for the slightest provocation.
Forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws,
forced breath-alcohol tests, forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, and
forced inclusion in biometric databases are just a few ways in which Americans
continue to be reminded that we have no control over what happens to our bodies
during an encounter with government officials.
Finally, we all bleed red. And we all suffer when violence becomes the
government’s calling card. Remember, in a police state, you’re either the one
with your hand on the trigger or you’re staring down the barrel of a loaded gun.
The oppression and injustice—be it in the form of shootings, surveillance,
fines, asset forfeiture, prison terms, roadside searches, and so on—will come to
all of us eventually unless we do something to stop it now.
are not problems that can be glibly dismissed with a few well-chosen words, as
most politicians are inclined to do. Nor will the 2016 elections do much to
alter our present course towards a police state.
the popularity contest for the new occupant of the White House will not
significantly alter the day-to-day life of the average American greatly at all.
Those life-changing decisions are made elsewhere, by nameless, unelected
government officials who have turned bureaucracy into a full-time and profitable
I point out in my book BattlefieldAmerica:
The War on the American People, these problems will continue to plague
our nation unless and until Americans wake up to the fact that we’re the only
ones who can change things for the better and then do something about it.
Indeed, the Constitution opens with those three vital words, “We the
the founders wanted us to understand is that we are the government.
is no government without us—our sheer numbers, our muscle, our economy, our
physical presence in this land. There can also be no police state—no tyranny—no
routine violations of our rights without our complicity and collusion—without
our turning a blind eye, shrugging our shoulders, allowing ourselves to be
distracted and our civic awareness diluted.
matter which candidate wins this election, the citizenry and those who represent
us need to be held accountable to this powerful truth.
IS THERE IS NO END TO THE OBAMA LAW LICENSE ROTTENNESS - WE KEEP FINDING STUFF OUT ABOUT BOTH OBAMA'S THAT THE LIBERAL NEWS MEDIA REFUSES TO DISCLOSE.
From a former intelligence officer...firstname.lastname@example.org
I checked this out and Barry lost his law licence for lying about drug use (among other things) on his application
Michelle Baby lost hers in 1991: Michelle Obama tried to extort some Sidley clients and lost her law license.
Ms. Obama entered Mayor Richard Daley's Office, courtesy of the Marxist Valerie Jarrett daughter in law of Vernon Jarrett the bosom friend of Frank Marshall Davis, the Marxist pedophile mentor of Barry Soetoro (1970-1978).
It is verified and Truth or Fiction shields them just as the legal website intended when they voluntarily gave up their licenses to keep out of the public record.
I knew they had both lost their law license, but I didn't know why until I read this.
This is legit. I checked it out myself at https://www.iardc.org . Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois; and they are very strict and mean as hell. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.
Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.
1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you.
2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!
3. So, we have the first black President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.
4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
6. "He did not hold the title of Professor of Law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S. Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence ... not the Constitution.
8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/
9. Free Republic: In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal.
10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?
When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.
Keep this moving -- educate others about the Obama law license controversy.
COMMENTS ABOUT THE OBAMA GRIFTERS, SCAMMERS AND OBAMA LAW LICENSE CONTROVERSY -
I am an Eagle Scout who is loyal, truthful, honest and trustworthy to you. “Be Prepared” is the Boy Scout motto. Isn't it?
You can learn more about the planned Hitler-like one-world government dictatorship - a 100 year old insidious takeover plot by inter-generational central banking elite - at my sister site www.one-world-government.org Hurry your and the worlds survival is at risk!
Obama Law License - continued
Pres. Barack Obama – Editor of the Harvard Law Review – Has No Law License???
May 15, 2009 by Johnny Alamo
I saw a note slide across the #TCOT feed on Twitter last night that mentioned Michelle Obama had no law license. This struck me as odd, since (a) she went to school to be a lawyer, and (b) she just recently held a position with the University of Chicago Hospitals as legal counsel — and that’s a pretty hard job to qualify for without a law license.
But being a licensed professional myself, I knew that every state not only requires licensure, they make it possible to check online the status of any licensed professional. So I did, and here’s the results from the ARDC Website:
She “voluntarily surrendered” her license in 1993. Let me explain what that means. A “Voluntary Surrender” is not something where you decide “Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?” and forget to renew your license. No, a “Voluntary Surrender” is something you do when you’ve been accused of something, and you ‘voluntarily surrender” your license about five seconds before the state suspends (or disbars) you.
I tried looking up why she would “Voluntarily surrender” her license, but Illinois does not have it’s 1993 records online.
But when I searched for “Obama”, I found this:
“Voluntarily retired” — what does that mean? Bill Clinton hung onto his law license until he was convicted of making a false statement in the Monica Lewinsky case and had to “Voluntarily Surrender” his license too.
This is the former editor of the Harvard Law Review who doesn’t seem to give a crap about his law license.
Something else odd; while the Search feature brings up the names, any searches for the Disciplinary actions ends quickly.
As in, Too Quickly. Less than a half-second quickly on a Search Engine that can take five seconds to Search for anything.
As in, “there’s a block on that information” kind of thing.
So we have the first Lawyer President and First Lady — who don’t actually have licenses to practice law.
There’s more to this story, I’m sure. I’ll let you know when I find it.
Comments - see - Share Your Comments - below
Have A Great Story About This Topic?
Do you have a great story about this? Share it!
The GREATER DEFLATION is approaching quickly!
We need to get the word out or else we will all be seeing each other down at the soup line.
Get Hosted by Sitesell Same as this Page! Many Benefits Click Below for info!
WHY PRESIDENT JOHNSON, J. EDGAR HOOVER, THE CIA, MASSOD, MAFIA, BANKSTERS
* KILLED PRESIDENT KENNEDY IN A FASCIST COUP TO FURTHER ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT BY SOCIALIST DICTATORSHIP * PS MAINSTREAM MEDIA, HOLLYWOOD AND BOTH POLITICAL PARTIES ARE NOW ZIONIST CONTROLLED
JFK CONSPIRACY SPEECH - REASON PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND HEAD OF FBI - J. EDGAR HOOVER DO COVERT COUP KILLING PRESIDENT JOHN F KENNEDY.
THEN IN BANKSTER SECRET SUBVERSION SABOTAGE SCHEME - THEY HAD JACK RUBY - (RUBENSTEIN/ZIONIST MAFIA) - CLEAN UP AND ASSASSINATE PATSY LEE HARVEY OSWALD
By President JFK 1961
John Fitzgerald Kennedy
"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings.
We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions.
Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment.
That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control.
And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know."
For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.
It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."
"No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary.
I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.
I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers-- I welcome it.
This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.
Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive.
That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.
And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.
This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security...
And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent."
Barack Hussein Obama never wrote the book advertised here in a 1991
publishers promotional pamphlet put out by his literary agency, Acton
& Dystel, of a coming Obama book for sale, "Images in Black and
Instead, Obama wrote (some say communist Bill Ayers
actually wrote) "Dreams from My Father" an autobiography with a
socialist slant depicting his communist father as an anticolonialist
blaming the west for all the world's ills.
That is where lawless
Obama's rogue renegade radical leftist transforming change ideas came
from. Obama's upbringing came from communist family members (father and
both grandparents on his mothers side), socialist mother and friends. In
fact, Obama's mentor and tutor. Frank Marshal Davis, was on the FBI
communist watch list - member of Communist Party USA (CPUSA) card number
47544. Then came Marxist groups in college and finally socialist groups
like the New Party in Chicago where he was a community organizer
See actual brochure from his publicist stating Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya, Africa - above.
"Hope and Change" campaign slogan has morphed into WE HOPE HE CHANGES.
Narcissist Obama showed himself to be an ideologue and a fascist
dictator puppet and mole for the criminal Anglo American financial power
elite international central banking families. This criminal cabal run
by the Zioniist Rothschild and Rockefeller family cabal cartel control
all the central (sovereign) banks of the world and wants one world
government/new world order aka new underworld order control goal of
global socialist fascist dictatorship at any cost or means.
in the Greater Depression, which actually began with the year 2000 dot
com bust, along with the plight of most American citizens worsened under
his statist agenda. Obama's legacy will be trillions of wasted stimulus
spending, grotesque government growth and over 1,000 dictatorial
executive orders - many unconstitutional - most illegal - all socialist
Working for his elite Rothschild handlers,
Obama has led us to the brink of economic collapse and planned coup by
Zionist bankster oligarchs who already control both political parties in
A phony Iran, Syrian and Ukrainian war leading to a
phony World War Three threatening the very survival of mankind is next
if we don't stop the insanity. Watch out for false flag nuclear
explosions in the Ukraine and Iran.
The American, NATO and
Israel elite scheme is to get the people so confused and demoralized
that they can abscond with the last of the world's middle classes power,
freedom and money in the coming Greatest Depression.
THINK: BIG BROTHER AND THE MAFIA JOIN UP!
The BANKSTER elite want a fascist socialist one world government dictatorship.
It's all about control of you and I. Pure Tyranny!
Fair Use Statement
Fair Use Statement
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.. www.deflationeconomy.com (“the site”) is making such material available in an effort to further understanding of political, social, economic, and scientific issues, etc. The site asserts this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlIf you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.